Both infrared and traditional saunas offer profound wellness benefits, but they deliver a fundamentally different experience. Here is how to decide which is right for you, your space, and your goals.
## Two Traditions, One Goal
The sauna has existed in some form for thousands of years. The Finnish tradition of the kiuas — a wood or electric stove surrounded by stones — produces intense, humid heat that cleanses through profuse perspiration. Infrared technology, developed in the late twentieth century, takes a different approach: warming the body directly rather than the surrounding air.
Both approaches deliver real, measurable wellness benefits. The question is which experience better suits you.
## The Traditional Sauna Experience
A traditional sauna operates at temperatures between 70°C and 100°C. The high ambient temperature, combined with the option to pour water over heated stones (löyly), creates a humid, enveloping heat that is deeply social and ritualistic in character.
The experience is intense. Within minutes, perspiration is profuse. The Finnish tradition involves alternating between periods of heat and cold — a cold shower, a plunge pool, or even a roll in the snow — which is understood to amplify the cardiovascular and immune benefits.
**Choose traditional if:**
- You want the authentic Finnish sauna ritual
- You enjoy very high heat and steam
- You have a social or family sauna culture in mind
- You want an outdoor installation as a garden feature
## The Infrared Sauna Experience
An infrared sauna operates at 45°C–65°C. The ambient air is considerably cooler, but the infrared energy heats tissue directly, creating a warmth that feels different — penetrating rather than enveloping. Many users find they can sustain longer sessions and that the experience is more accessible for daily use.
There is no steam, and the lower temperature makes conversation more comfortable, though infrared saunas remain a predominantly personal or paired experience.
**Choose infrared if:**
- You want daily wellness support with lower time and energy commitment
- You prefer a gentler, longer session
- You are focused on muscle recovery, joint health, or skin benefits
- You want faster heat-up times and lower running costs
## Installation and Running Costs
Both ranges in Gravity's collection operate on a standard UK 13-amp plug. This is a significant differentiator from many competitors and eliminates the need for an electrician or dedicated circuit.
Running costs favour infrared slightly: a typical 40-minute session uses approximately 0.9–1.2 kWh, versus 1.2–1.8 kWh for a traditional session of similar duration.
## Our Recommendation
For most first-time buyers, the Gravity Arc infrared series offers the most accessible and versatile entry into home sauna ownership. For those who love the ritual and social dimension of the classic sauna, the Gravity Vale traditional series delivers an experience that is difficult to replicate by any other means.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which type of sauna burns more calories?
Both types produce comparable caloric expenditure over a session, as both elevate heart rate and metabolic rate. The precise figures vary by individual, session length, and temperature.
Can I add steam to an infrared sauna?
Traditional steam or löyly is not compatible with infrared saunas, as moisture can damage the infrared panels. Some manufacturers offer hybrid models, but Gravity recommends choosing the right type for your primary use.
Which heats up faster?
Infrared saunas typically reach operating temperature in 15–20 minutes. Traditional saunas take 30–45 minutes to heat the stones and cabin to operating temperature.